On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 11:39 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Also, jhutz > has just about convinced me that it is irresponsible to use the last spare > field for a specific extension (as opposed to a general extensible > structure), even if we think that a full format revision is coming "soon", > so that sould be added to the design considerations list.
A format revision of that type isn't coming "soon" until it actually appears. We've talked about it for years, but nothing has ever actually been done. I don't foresee it happening soon, for the same reason you're not -- there's no one feature for which it's worthwhile to do a major bump, especially if backward compatibility is an issue. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
