On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 15:12 -0400, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> For platforms with multiple slaves, we could have two builders, one with > all the slaves, and one with only one slave. The single-slave builder > could be assigned to the master branch and the multi-slave builder could > be assigned to the other branches. I guess I don't see an advantage to this. The branches which only get pullups once in a while get all the cycles, while the branch where the real work happens gets to be starved? The whole reason this came up is because I noticed it was taking a long time for the builtbot to get to changes I submit, even when things are relatively quiet, and I wanted to throw more cycles into the pool to make that get better. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
