On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:48:41 -0400 Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Clients that are behind a NAT with an old enough client are very sad > because every time the port mapping drops they are assigned a new port > number. The file server then attempts to contact them at the old port > number and fails. In the meantime they experience a timeout. I > certainly received plenty of complaints from work at home end users. It will be slow, but it shouldn't break. If it does break, that's a fileserver bug, since changing addresses should not cause a failure to access a file. If I got a complaint every time a user thought AFS was slow... [...] > I'm quite skeptical this will help in a majority of cases. Okay, I disagree; I could go into why, but that's not the point. I'm not seeing reasons _not_ to do this. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
