On 09/27/2013 03:28 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
On Sep 27, 2013, at 20:20 , Jason Edgecombe wrote:
On 09/27/2013 03:09 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Jason Edgecombe wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to thank Derek Atkins for agreeing to host and administer a fedora
19 build slave for the OpenAFS project. The build slave is up and running. It's
currently configured to build the master branch twice a day. 3 compiles have
completed successfully.
The elapsed build times of the 3 compile runs is 18 minutes, 11 minutes, and 11
minutes.
If the build slave is stable enough, are there any objections to adding the
fedora slave to the gerrit-triggered builds?
Please do add it.
I usually wait a few days to gauge stability, but I'll add it sooner if someone
else seconds the proposal to add the fedora buildslave to the gerrit builds.
Seconded. It does make sense, and if there are problems with it they have to be
dealt with anyway.
I have two questions: Will this slave have a frozen package setup, or will it
receive the regular package updates? And what will happen when F19 reaches its
EOL?
Done. The fedora19 builder is now triggered by gerrit.
I don't know. Derek is the admin and would decide that.
My preference is to have the slaves keep up with patches, but others
have different opinions. After Fedora 19 goes EOL, we could leave it
as-is, upgrade to fedora 20 or migrate to Centos7 at that time. Having a
Fedora slave allows us to have a head-start on RHEL/Centos 7. Once
RHEL/Centos 7 is released (in 2014?), we might want a slave for fedora
20+ and one for RHEL7. The discussion of the RHEL5 support timeline may
pop up at that time.
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
