On Dec 6, 2013, at 06:00 , Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Stephan Wiesand > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Feedback on pre1 has been underwhelming. Pre2 is another chance to ask for >> it. >> > > By the way I did get a chance to deploy 1.6.6pre1 on my small test > cell running on Fedora 20. No noticeable regressions in the servers or > clients. > > Instead of cherry-picking the newer kernel patches on to 1.6.5.1 I > took the easier way out and pushed 1.6.6pre1 version to RPM Fusion. No > new bugs reported so far.
Thanks a lot Ken! Pre2 may take a bit longer than I hoped: It turns out there are three more changes needed for Mavericks support (pullups are 10541/2/3). And then there's the upcoming 10547 I think we want the pullup of that in pre2 too. -- Stephan Wiesand DESY -DV- Platanenenallee 6 15738 Zeuthen, Germany _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
