On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Stephan Wiesand <[email protected]> wrote:
> == Next stable branch(es) == > > Mike & Stephan would prefer the successor of 1.6 to be 1.8, if there's no > general change to handling/naming branches. > > Daria proposes keeping the Windows/Others branches unlinked, allowing > different release schedules for them, while all changes should still go > through the master branch. Naming should then change to something like > "Portable OpenAFS" vs. "Windows OpenAFS", rather than "OpenAFS 1.8" vs. > "OpenAFS 1.9". I’m hugely in favor of both of those. When I suggest folks run 1.7.X on their windows boxes they get nervous “because odd numbers are experimental.”_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
