On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:37:22 +0100 Christof Hanke <[email protected]> wrote:
> When you are packaging openafs, the paths are decided by the distribution, > not > upstream. Which reminds me that OpenAFS should possibly provide a short README to package maintainers about what the packaging is expected to do for an OpenAFS install. While all the package maintainers should be on release-team mailing list, I don't know that they all are. Anyway, it seems like it might be a good idea to tell maintainers what to do if OpenAFS is gettting away from maintaining the packaging. > Other than that, I agree with the external rotation solution. If it was clear before I prefer external rotation since it doesn't duplicate work already done. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
