Well, I wanted to first query folk as to what they thought was appropriate.
Should we just say something to the affect of packages are avaailble from 3rd party providers both with and without paid support? Should we name said 3rd party providers (I'm only currently just recently aware of Jeff's)? Should we link to them? I'd vote on linking to them, as long as we are consistent about linking to anyone else (and this seems to be in practive with what other projects do). Thanks. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:16:54PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Dave B. wrote: > > > Coolness. The website's Mac page, then, should probably at the very least > > have > > a note that current Mac packages are available from 3rd party providers. > > The website is managed in git and changes go through gerrit, just as for > the source code -- clone openafs-web.git and have at it! > > -Ben -- ******************************** David William Botsch Programmer/Analyst @CNFComputing [email protected] ******************************** _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
