I pushed a patch that used a C99 language feature (Gerritt 11858). Ben caught that and felt the community should explicitly approve the use of C99 language features rather than just have it happen by stealth with patches going in that contain C99 extensions. So what say ye all? C99 OK for 1.8 and later releases? ... Perry
- [OpenAFS-devel] Expliotation of C99 features in OpenAFS cod... Perry Ruiter
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Expliotation of C99 features in Op... Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Expliotation of C99 features in Op... Jeffrey Altman
