>>>>> "Derek" == Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Derek> There are some companies in New York that would claim Derek> emphatically "yes, it's stable enough". Well, one of those companies will say so, but with a few important caveats. Morgan Stanley's use of AFs does NOT include such large volumes, and in fact, we are deprecating the use of AFS for RW data on large scale, and encourging users to use NFS/SAN solutions instead. OpenAFS has proven to be VERY stable for us, but we primarily care about RO replication, and not RW data. We also have an environment with lots of clients, all accessing mostly RO data, so the kinds of poblems you will see will be very different from those we have seen. "EC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hi, >> >> Newbie to OpenAFS question : Is Linux OpenAFS stable enough to use for a >> commercial use inside a heavy traffic, very large volumes (>1TB), small and >> big files, system. Configuration would probably be of kind "more servers >> than clients". >> >> EC. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenAFS-info mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info >> >> Derek> -- Derek> Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Derek> Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) Derek> URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH Derek> [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available Derek> _______________________________________________ Derek> OpenAFS-info mailing list Derek> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Derek> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
