Please read my message. I asked where do I send it to? I don't think the average user is going to learn enough about Latex or the documentation to be effective.
There are hundreds of separate files in the IBM documentation. Who will proof the edits? Or check the technical accuracy, expecially on all the different architectures suported? The IBM documentation looks like it was emitted from a very sophisticated internal documentation system. tedc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Hutzelman Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 8:09 PM To: ted creedon Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Documentation project On Thursday, June 09, 2005 01:31:06 PM -0700 ted creedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... but I don't think anyone but me will be dong updates anyway. That doesn't sound like a reasonable assumption to me, either in theory or in practice. This is an open-source project, and it needs to be possible for people to contribute changes to it, including to its documentation. Not changes of the form "Ted, please make it say blah". Changes in the form of patches, which can be integrated by gatekeepers, without your involvement. -- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Research Systems Programmer School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
