IBM.htm -> HTML is what was sent I n a tar file to open afs bugs. Html will just be a bear to update if new items are added and need to be indexed or hyperlinked. instance.
tedc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Esther Filderman Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 12:08 PM To: openafs-info@openafs.org Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Documentation project comments On 6/10/05, ted creedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what its worth, I think html documentation with hyperlinks is not > the best way to go. It just happened to get done first on the second > round of conversions. Yes, you've made your bias clear since you started this. While I sincerely appreciate your effort, we MUST have documentation that's available online. Requiring people to download giant postscript or pdf files to look up one command is ludicrious. Making things look pretty is fine, but they also have to be usable. In the end, HTML is likely going to be the most used. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
