On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
disk cache was more reliable. We'd periodically see odd problems with memory cache (stale volumes, file servers marked incorrectly as down, that sort of thing). We didn't notice any real performance differences. Of course, if the system is diskless, this doesn't really help. :) This was back in the mid 1.2 days, so it may be that subsequent changes have made this information obsolete.
I doubt it has. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
