I have the following ports open : omega:~# nmap -sU omega.domain.edu
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2005-08-30 17:29 EDT Interesting ports on omega (xy.xy.xy.xxx): (The 1471 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) PORT STATE SERVICE 123/udp open|filtered ntp 7000/udp open|filtered afs3-fileserver 7001/udp open|filtered afs3-callback 7002/udp open|filtered afs3-prserver 7003/udp open|filtered afs3-vlserver 7005/udp open|filtered afs3-volser 7007/udp open|filtered afs3-bos Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 1.741 seconds I do not have kaserver running as I am using kerberos 5 for authentication. What service usually runs on 7006 ? On Tuesday 30 August 2005 5:28 pm, Brian Sebby wrote: > There's a page in the Wiki with the port numbers: > > http://grand.central.org/twiki/bin/view/AFSLore/AdminFAQ#3_07_Which_TCP_IP_ >ports_and_prot > > Simple answer: UDP Ports 7000-7007. > > More specifically: > > fileserver 7000/udp > cachemanager 7001/udp > ptserver 7002/udp > vlserver 7003/udp > kaserver 7004/udp > volserver 7005/udp > reserved 7006/udp > bosserver 7007/udp > > I also gave a presentation on this at the AFS workshop a couple of years > ago, the slides are at: > > http://www.sebby.org/afs/ > > > Brian > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:19:55PM -0400, Madhusudan Singh wrote: > > What are the ports needed for file server to be able to respond to > > clients ? Our file server is up and working, users are able to login over > > ssh with their kerberos credentials, but openafs clients seem to be > > unable to connect. > > > > On Friday 26 August 2005 8:15 pm, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > I think most of us have written our own version of this. It's hard to > > > write a really general version, since there are so many site-specific > > > integration points, local user databases that have to be referred to, > > > LDAP repositories of user information, etc. > > > > > > The Debian packages don't include uss, I think because it's generally > > > not considered horribly useful at this point. But if people do end up > > > finding it useful, we could include it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenAFS-info mailing list > > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
