-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Sonenberg wrote: > What about interoperability with 1.2.13? Can I migrate the 3 servers > one at a time or will running different versions create problems?
As far as I know, they work together with no prob. Running different versions should not create any problems. Thats what I've read out of the ML here all the time. Me for my part have only tested one 1.2.13 client with some 1.3.8[3-7] clients and server. And there was NO problem. But you can test one server first, after this with no error the next one. At least you've got three database server. And don't forget: the new version was designed to be compatible with old versions, but integrate more/new features. >>I assume 1.2.13 and 1.4.0 will work flawless together in a network. >>So just migrate one after another. >>And: there is no need to convert the database. >>It should work out of the box with 1.4.0. >> >>Cya >>Lars > > > Bye Lars - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel.: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-Key-ID: 0xB87A0E03 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDegmiVguzrLh6DgMRApOcAJ9LEj4UfKhNjdqXsO0UGVchFT4ULQCgqaJG pY/7AyxZeWFS/06pCfxwqvw= =jDrC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
