On Friday, December 09, 2005 10:13:45 AM +0000 David Howells
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neither. That message is relatively normal and is perfectly safe to
ignore. The tainting is due to the fact that the Linux Developers don't
consider the IPL a "valid" open source license.
It's not GPL compatible, which is, I think, the point.
Let's please not get into this flamewar again.
In any case, the message quoted was:
kernel: openafs: no version for "sys_close" found: kernel tainted.
This is _not_ tainting due to a license issue; it's tainting because libafs
contains a weak reference to sys_close, which is not exported in that
particular kernel. In this instance, that's perfectly normal.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
