Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Because of that, I think you'd be best off if whatever technical solution > you came up with looked like Kerberos from the AFS perspective.
Yes, I'm happy with a krb524d-style solution (where the OpenAFS client transparently handles the additional hoop-jumping incurred by the layering) rather than a solution like gssklogd in its current state (where the user has to download and compile some separate utility and generally expend a lot of extra effort). This is really what I need to get a feel for before I start. - a _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
