Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And third, the assumption isn't in the applications; it's in libkrb5. >> Upcasing the domain is the final fallback algorithm used to determine >> the realm for a host if DNS lookups fail (or are turned off, which is >> the default as mentioned by others) and there's no realm mapping in the >> krb5.conf. > I see. Where can I find the official standard procedure by which this > mapping is performed by all compliant implementations? Hm, I'm not sure that anything like that *could* exist. The RFCs are concerned with the on-the-wire protocol; locally configured mappings would be outside their scope. MIT Kerberos and Heimdal are different implementations that could well use different logic. Shishi is yet another implementation with its own logic. Microsoft might do something else. I don't think this is the kind of area where you are going to get that sort of document. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
