> > Wed Mar 1 05:38:57 2006 trans 472 on volume 536870933 is older > > than 300 seconds > AFAIK, that's just an informative log entry. > It's telling you that the volume release took longer than X seconds. > It's nothing wrong with that.
That's what I gathered from the old messages from the list archives, but in my case there were files which should have ended up on the RO volumes but did not. I.e. files created after the previous release and before the failed one. There was nothing else wrong with the release - none of the volumes had any New or Old flags set, it was still accessible etc. It just did not contain what it should have contained. That is the part that makes me worried. Especially since its primarily my assurances of the reliability of AFS that got it implemented in the first place... so it'll be my head on the block if it fails our expectations. =) Cheers, Juha -- ----------------------------------------------- | Juha Jäykkä, [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | home: http://www.utu.fi/~juolja/ | -----------------------------------------------
pgpdAdJwCcjeL.pgp
Description: PGP signature