Jeffrey Hutzelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:54:55 PM -0500 "Christopher D. > Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would recomend doing server upgrades as close as possible though to >> minimize problems that may occur. > > FUD. Mixed-server-version cells work just fine. There are > situations in which you want to be careful about mixing database > server versions, such as when the database format changes, but that > hasn't happened in a long time (again, since before OpenAFS). We > expect such format changes in the future (perhaps around the 2.0.x > timeframe), but I'd be very surprised and upset if they came in the > middle of the 1.4.x branch, and what design work has been done in > this area so far has paid at least some attention to backward > compatibility.
mea culpa I was going by old IBM docs, which apparently don't apply anymore: https://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-devel/2005-March/011717.html <<CDC _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
