chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Der > rick J Brashear writes: >> I guess you didn't read the ticket I merged yours into. No, something >> dislikes "1.4.2rc1" as a version string. I am still trying to figure out >> what I should call this so I can fix it. > > apple is peculiar about the format for CFBundleVersion. see > http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn1132.html
We understand the format requirements. The question is what the version number should be. Before we went to 1.4.0 the version number stayed at 1.3.99 throughout all of the release candidates. Now that we are at 1.4.2 it is unclear what release candidates should use. On Windows, the version numbers are 1.4.0200 for the initial release candidate and then 1.4.0201, 1.4.0202, etc. until we are finished. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
