In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Steve Simmons write s: >Inversions file system, a project which built a fs on top of >University Ingres. It was presented at a USENIX. As I recall, they >claimed somewhere about a 2:1 overhead in general.
it depends on how this was measured. user -> kernel -> native fs is going to go pretty well since you dont have the extra copy back to userspace. user -> kernel -> userspace db is not going to perform well due to the extra copy. the afs fileserver wouldnt see this same penalty. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
