On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:47:38PM -0800, Henry B. Hotz wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Nicolas Williams wrote: > > >BTW, a PAG facility that's faithful to the AFS notion of PAGs > > >should be > > >relatively easy to specify and implement for Solaris, but it will be > > >more involved than you might have thought. That's because we have > > >proc(4), proc(1), truss(1) and ucred_get(3C) to worry about, plus > > >libproc. So we're talking about: > > > > Does it still need to be that involved if all it is is an index number?
Please move this discuission to openafs-devel, where it belongs. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
