On Friday, April 13, 2007 05:14:28 PM -0700 Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Bill Stivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I know that this discussion was beaten 7 ways from Sunday in the
recent past, but I thought it worth asking.  Did someone ever get
around to committing a patch that enabled switching behavior between
"implicit a" for directory creators versus "no implicit a" for
directory creators?

This patch adds a configure-time "--disable-volume-owner-a" which
has the desired effect.

No, it doesn't. Bill was asking about implicit permissions granted to the owner (creator) of a directory, not a volume.

Also, please do not add configure-time options to control behavior. New configure-time options are normally appropriate only when they affect things which must be decided at compile-time, such as which platform we're building for, what directory layout to use, or which external packages to use. From time to time you will see a configure option to enable a feature which represents a substantial code change which is not yet ready to be included by default, but those cases are exceptions rather than the rule.

I've also updated the "compendium of ways AFS cares about UNIX
owner/group/modebits" after staring at afsfileprocs.c for a while:

It might help to start with the idea that AFS is not other filesystems, and has its own semantics, rather than being surprised every time AFS's semantics are not the same as those of some existing filesystem...

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to