On 10/24/07, Steven Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/24/07, Kevin Hildebrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We've actually had this need a number of times... Say for instance, > > you've installed a new version of software in volume X for testing > > purposes, or as Derrick suggests, using the volume as a web backend. > > > > Then you run out of disk space, have a failing server, etc, and you need > > to move the RO replications - there's no easy way to do so without > > releasing the volume. > > > > I sort of understand this need, but I suggest that it's caused by poor > namespace management, and that the solution should be to improve that > rather than try to keep your RWs and ROs out of sync with each other.
not everyone has VMS. it has nothing to do with namespace management. nothing is as easy as "vos release" to copy data around.
