On 10/24/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:15 , Steven Jenkins wrote: > > > - the RO handling is not good -- what happens if the _only_ RO is on > > the old server and the remsite happens? Clients with existing > > remsite is irrelevant: it just informs the vlserver of where an R/O > replica will be stored in the future, it has no impact whatsoever on > what R/Os (if any) exist *now*. > > --
remsite is _very_ relevant for clients that don't already know about the RO that has been remsite'd -- when they ask the vlserver for the volume, the vlserver will tell them that only the RW exists. Steven _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
