> Douglas E. Engert wrote: > >>> Sounds like the tail waging the dog. There are KDCs used with AFS > >>> that are not modifiable, and don't support any k4. You don't want to > >>> fiddle with the K5 protocols either. the Its time to get AFS 'k5-izes'.
> >> Yes, it would be lovely if AFS was 100% K5. > > The hint was to the AFS developers, that it is time, and some of us > > use KDCs that are not modifiable. > Would ANL or IASTATE like to fund the work? Or anyone else for that matter? I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be at the top of our list either. I can think of at least a half dozen things on the roadmap that I would sooner see. And it's not clear to me how much longer AFS will be our main filesystem. John _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info