What's the semantics for negative ACLs? For example, fs sa . system:authuser rl fs sa . badguy +rl -negative
I'm guessing that'll give badguy negative "rl" bits. Should 'fs sa . badguy -rl' implicitly give him negative "rl" bits, if he doesn't have anything already? On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Derrick J Brashear <sha...@dementia.org> wrote: > The provided patch adds the ability to add or subtract rights from an acl > element, e.g. a+ or a- to add or subtract the administer bit from an acl, > like fs sa . shadow a+ > would give shadow the a bit in addition to whatever bits he already had. > > It's user-visible. Before we go anywhere with it, ignoring code issues, what > UI should this have, assuming we do want this feature (I certianly see the > utility) > > https://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=123962 > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > -- Tom Maher _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
