Harald Barth wrote: >> "afs: failed to store file (5)" now and then. >> > > This patch is currently the best guess: > > # cat STABLE14-rx-idledead-only-ignore-keepalives-20081222.patch > --- src/rx/rx.c.orig 2008-09-25 19:26:47.000000000 +0200 > +++ src/rx/rx.c 2009-03-12 18:01:22.000000000 +0100 > @@ -5380,7 +5380,7 @@ > * idle connections) */ > conn->lastSendTime = call->lastSendTime = clock_Sec(); > /* Don't count keepalives here, so idleness can be tracked. */ > - if (p->header.type != RX_PACKET_TYPE_ACK) > + if ((p->header.type != RX_PACKET_TYPE_ACK) || (((struct rx_ackPacket > *)rx_DataOf(p))->reason != RX_ACK_PING)) > call->lastSendData = call->lastSendTime; > } > > Hm, so this would mean that the error is just because of some time counter do not get updated? I'll see if I can apply it and test. Thanks!
-- Ragge >> There are lots of file accesses to the machine so I have no idea what >> causing this. >> > > I'll leave that ... > > >> Anyone have an idea? Is the message above fatal or will it try again to >> save the file? >> > > The error is returned to the user. > > Harald. > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info