On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:51:11 -0500
Michael Meffie <mmef...@sinenomine.net> wrote:
> > It seems to me that restricting system:authuser would be less common
> > than anyuser/anonymous, but it still could be useful; and we have
> > other methods that cover the use case.
>
> I'm failing to see a use case here. Anyone on this list have a
> concrete example?
In other words: *** PLEASE SPEAK UP *** if you want to be able to
prevent normal users from doing something like "fs setacl ${HOME}
system:authuser rlidwka" even when they have the 'a' bit on ${HOME}.
Even if it's just "+1, yes, I want that", please say something.
--
Andrew Deason
adea...@sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
