On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) <c...@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> wrote: > In message > <db6e3f110912100538i4f7ef40fy82acdc1040463...@mail.gmail.com>,Derric > k Brashear writes: >>Allowing N chunks with M chunksize configured, where N*M is greater >>than the cache size you configured seems entirely reasonable: not >>every chunk will be filled. > > but they could be. at which point afs breaks and the user will have a > poor experience with afs -- "afs sucks".
why could they be? or rather, why does it need to work that way? i don't see why we'd promise it being possible, or why it would need to be. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
