On 4/14/2010 10:51 AM, Steve Simmons wrote: > > On Apr 13, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > >>> >>> I'm a long-time fan of having a switch that causes tools to dump their data >>> in an easy-to-machine-parse format. That isn't always doable, but when it >>> is, it's a big win. >> >> As Andrew pointed out in another reply in this thread, the -format >> switch is support to provide that but it fails to provide a consistent >> (value - data) pair per line. > > Exactly my point. We currently snarf off all that data nightly via script > that parses the output from vos e -format. It works but was a pain. > > Note, tho, that some data doesn't adapt well to single-line output. For > example, > > just doesn't map well to single-line. We currently deal with this by creating > four records, each will all the data from the rest of the output and the > specifics of the four entries above. > > Steve
Anyone want a -xml option?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
