On May 19, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote: > On 19 May 2010, at 13:29, Mark Huijgen wrote: >> >> Would it be safe to apply this NAT ping functionality to the 1.4.x >> series also? > > Define safe.
Funny, my boss asked me the same question. :-) Fortunately for us as OP, it appears our person with the problem was successfully able to install the 1.5.74 client and is happily running. Given the discussion here about the number of keepalives escalating over time, it appears the fix needs more tuning. Since it's only running on a couple of clients at the moment, the number of keepalive packets doesn't seem to be an issue. Before it rolls out generally in a production version, that issue should be and is being addressed. I'm happy, my user is happy. Aside from that, we've got higher priority AFS fish to fry and will wait for either more time or resolution from others. Steve_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
