On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:36:13 +0100 Simon Wilkinson <s...@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> The difficulty here is - what should packagers build? If DAFS isn't on > by default, then most folk won't actually get the benefit of running > it unless they build their own AFS servers. I suspect that shipping > 1.6 with dafs disabled by default isn't actually going to result in > much perceived change over 1.4. > > I wonder how hard it would be to ship both versions of the fileserver > side by side ... I thought that I was going to see openafs-fileserver and openafs-fileserver-dafs packages (or openafs-dafs, etc), but I'm obviously not the one making them... I thought the last time I was in a conversation about this, the big problem was what to do about the BosConfig conversion that must happen to support DAFS (or roll back). Does that have any good solution? -- Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
