On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:49:58 -0500 Marc Dionne <marc.c.dio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not following you; why can the cache truncate daemon not be > > triggered and waited for, like in normal cache shortage conditions? > > a) I'm pretty sure the cache truncate daemon simply skips dirty chunks > and doesn't do any writeback to the server. > b) The truncate daemon only looks at cache usage, not at dirtiness. > So we can be above the threshold where doPartialWrite will insist on > writing back data (2/3 of cache chunks dirty), but the cache is still > well below the threshold where the truncate daemon will start to > shrink (95% chunks or 90% space I think) Okay, so we're "full" of locally-written data. I was reading Simon's comments to mean that the cache is just >90% filled, but what he's (apparently) actually saying makes a lot more sense. -- Andrew Deason adea...@sinenomine.net _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
