>> it still isnt clear to me that i should expect the standard tools to >> tell me what someone else did. i can understand wanting to see what >> some tool might have done automatically because of a restart (or some >> other failure). >> >> if your other admin cant remember what he did, perhaps he should be >> an admin. if the other admin cant tell you what he did, perhaps he >> shouldnt be an admin. logging isnt meant to solve 'social' issues. >> >> yes, this seems draconian but the only solution is audting/logging inside >> the servers of all the commands so you can completely reconstruct what >> the other admins are doing. some people might like this but it really >> seems like too much to me. > > (...re-sent to list...) > > Some organizations, like banks, are required to have audit trails for many > operations. I don't know the regulations, but these logs might not be just > for social reasons. In some industries, draconian might be considered a > desirable feature.
plus, we have auditlogs now which if not commands do tell you who executed what when. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
