On 6 Dec 2010, at 15:34, Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:07:15 +0000 > Simon Wilkinson <s...@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > >> On 6 Dec 2010, at 04:28, Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> wrote: >>> >>> Features that are backwards-incompatible, and cause nontrivial >>> downtime to revert, I'd hope we'd wait at least a release. >> >> We could easily structure this change in a way that preserved >> backwards compatibility. > > I'd like to hear how you plan to do that. Old bosservers deal poorly > with new BosConfig directives, and a new BosConfig directive is how > current bosservers turn on restricted mode. You don't use an entry in BosConfig to record when re > >>> And keep in mind I'm trying to think of stable release cycles in >>> terms of what was discussed at BPW 2010, not the glacial pace of >>> e.g. 1.2 -> 1.4. It wouldn't/shouldn't take that long. >> >> We have still to demonstrate that we can rapidly make stable releases. >> 1.6 is taking an age to get out of the door, primarily due to demand >> attach. > > DAFS has had nothing to do with this for at least the past 6 months. > > -- > Andrew Deason > adea...@sinenomine.net > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
