One way you can take deterministic advantage of more memory in today's fileservers (caveat, if you have the workload) is to increase the number of callbacks supported. If you're not already setting a million or so, for rw file service, you might consider increasing that parameter.
Matt ----- "Jaap Winius" <jwin...@umrk.nl> wrote: > Okay, so a memory cache, like a disk cache, is just client stuff. But, > > this still leaves me wondering how to tell when an OpenAFS file server > > is happy with the memory that it has and when it is better to give it > > more. > > Cheers, > > Jaap > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
