In message <d246ebed-bcc4-488d-846a-b4e80eda9...@desy.de>,Peter van der Reest 
writes:
>PS: I personally do not see the need for a name change on our part, CODA
>could have a codabackup?

as you may know, coda and afs share a common ancestry so i am surpised
this is the only name conflict.  apparently coda did prefix most things
with a c but didnt to do so on backup.  coda should probably change
backup to cbackup to be consistent but we cant force them to do anything.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to