Andrew Deason <adea...@sinenomine.net> writes: > Secondly, this is easily modifiable by distributions. I think the > closest thing Linux has to a "platform" like those of commercial unices > (and maybe the BSDs) is a distribution-specific moniker. Just because > the OpenAFS project doesn't include anything more specific than > "$arch_linux26" by default doesn't mean we can't have a distro-specific > tag by default in front of that (and the RPMs related to this thread are > already doing that). That seems like a pretty easy way to get more > granularity and be more 'modern'.
I suppose I could do that in Debian. I'd feel more comfortable doing it if any Debian user had ever indicated a desire for an @sys that identified the Debian stable version (which would be the obvious thing to put in there). If I do that for Debian, though, Ubuntu is going to be a mess. -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
