That might be true, however, things like single DES going away (sort of) as I understand it can break things with older clients.
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:44:21AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Dave B. wrote: > > >One of our main thoughts is that the version numbers should be > >indicative of client/server compatibility. > > clients and servers communicate via the AFS-3 network protocol; new > features (RPCs) are added to that protocol in a backwards-compatible > manner. The expectation is that any client version should function > usefully against any server version; I don't see there being such > compatibility concerns. > > -Ben > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- ******************************** David William Botsch Programmer/Analyst @CNFComputing bot...@cnf.cornell.edu ******************************** _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list OpenAFS-info@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info