On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Stephen Joyce <step...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> Jeffrey, > > I'd like to learn more about this. However since you sell a proprietary > fork of OpenAFS, it's difficult to discount your possible incentive to > spread FUD regarding OpenAFS. > > Therefore can you provide URIs with specific information to educate me > (and possibly others) regarding these contractual obligations related to > binary signing? > > Thanks in advance! > What you are (should be, anyway) able to do without incurring liability is between you and whatever lawyer is retained by whoever will cover your ass if you get sued. I have no idea what their URI is, and it would presumably be unique to you and not the other posters anyway, at least at the moment. However, I'll put out a suggestion that if you want to be involved in handling this from an OpenAFS perspective, the Foundation is still soliciting board members. -- Daria
