That worked to make it compile. I will try to test it on arm system later today. Thanks for your help!
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:03 PM Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:31:32PM -0500, Gary Gatling wrote: > > Hi. Thanks so much for replying. I was actually looking at this again > > tonight, for some odd reason I can't explain. > > > > It was so stupid. I did not set the sysname. I have added: > > > > %ifarch aarch64 > > %define sysname aarch64_linux26 > > I think you want "arm64_linux26" -- see src/config/param.arm64_linux26.h > > -Ben > > > %endif > > > > > > I get a different error now: > > > > echo 'char* AFSVersion = "openafs '$VERSION'";' > > >>AFS_component_version_number.c.NEW && \ > > if cmp AFS_component_version_number.c.NEW AFS_component_version_number.c > > > > /dev/null 2>&1 ; then : ; else \ > > mv AFS_component_version_number.c.NEW AFS_component_version_number.c ; > fi ) > > rm -f AFS_component_version_number.c.NEW > > make[4]: Leaving directory > > '/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config' > > gcc -g -O -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config > > -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include -I. -I. -o > > config.o -c config.c > > gcc -g -O -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config > > -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include -I. -I. -o mc.o > -c > > mc.c > > gcc -L/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/lib > > -L/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/lib -g -O -g -O > > -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config > > -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include -I. -I. -o > config > > config.o mc.o > > gcc -g -O -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config > > -I/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include -I. -I. > > -L/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/lib > > -L/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/lib -g -O \ > > -o mkvers ./mkvers.c > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'param.aarch64_linux26.h', needed by > > 'param.h.new'. Stop. > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > '/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config' > > make[2]: *** [Makefile:146: config] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2' > > make[1]: *** [Makefile:650: build] Error 2 > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/gsgatlin/redhat/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2' > > make: *** [Makefile:35: all_nolibafs] Error 2 > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ZbdvPL (%build) > > > > Any idea what that means? :) > > > > *** No rule to make target 'param.aarch64_linux26.h', needed by > > 'param.h.new'. Stop. > > > > I am running this inside qemu on a intel dell laptop. > > > > Thanks a lot for any ideas you might have. I can upload any makefiles to > > pastebin. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:55 PM Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:11:44AM -0500, Gary Gatling wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > When I try to compile openafs on fedora 29 on x86_64 it works fine > but > > > when > > > > I try to compile openafs on fedora 29 on aarch64 I get an error: > > > > > > > > mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include/hcrypto > > > > mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/include/opr > > > > mkdir -p /builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/lib > > > > cd src && cd config && make all > > > > make[3]: Entering directory > > > '/builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config' > > > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > > '/builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2/src/config' > > > > Makefile:68: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop. > > > > make[2]: *** [Makefile:146: config] Error 2 > > > > make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2' > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/openafs-1.8.2' > > > > make[1]: *** [Makefile:650: build] Error 2 > > > > make: *** [Makefile:35: all_nolibafs] Error 2 > > > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.B61XCV (%build) > > > > > > > > I get this error on RHEL 8 beta (aarch64) also in "mock." > > > > > > > > Has anyone else run into this before? Was just curious if there was a > > > known > > > > solution. The problem seems to be in the Makefile on line 68 with > "mixed > > > > implicit and normal rules" although maybe that is not the real > problem? > > > > > > Hi Gary, > > > > > > I don't recall haring about such errors previously. The direct > debugging > > > techniques would seem to require examining the apparently problematic > > > Makefile; would you be able to post the generated src/config/Makefile > > > somewhere? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ben > > > >
