We decided on /etc/corosync as the dir, not /etc/ais for the uidgid.d
directory.  Other then that looks good

regards
-steve

On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 11:49 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Attached is second version of patch.
> 
> Read from dir uses better name for function (no security but rather
> uidgid) so it's included too. Take it as a version, which will be
> back-ported to RHEL 5.
> 
> Regards,
>   Honza
> 
> Steven Dake wrote:
> > rename "security" as an objdb key to "uidgid".
> > 
> > The uid || gid should be valid, not requiring an and operation.
> > 
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:21 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote:
> >> Attached is first version of support for multiple security items (uid-gid).
> >>
> >> First question what I have. I'm currently testing uid and gid as a pair,
> >> so user process must have gid and uid (not only uid or gid). Is that
> >> correct, or you will rather see something, what will check uid OR gid?
> >> (From my point of view, both solution are acceptable and both have some
> >> pros/cons, so I think, there should be major consensus)
> >>
> > or operation
> > 
> >> Second question. Items are cached, but in list. Steve talked something
> >> about, that this is fast path, so isn't list some performance killer? If
> >> yes, I think we can use:
> >> - hash table (red black tree/...) in case 1. question will be answered,
> >> that we should check uid and gid as a pair
> >> - bit-array of uid and gid, if 1. question will be answered uid OR gid
> >>
> > A list should be ok for now.
> > 
> >> Third question. I'm not sure, if I should implement some reloading stuff
> >> or not. Because in current implementation, ug_config.uid/gid are never
> >> reloaded, and only logstuff is reloaded.
> >>
> > 
> > followup patch imo
> > 
> >> Fourth think. From my point of view. ug_config.uid/gid no longer make
> >> sense to be used for IPC authentifications (becase this patch should be
> >> full and better replacement), so second patch (corosync-remove-...)
> >> removes this.
> >>
> > 
> > ok
> > 
> >> And last think. Can please somebody with native English language update
> >> manual pages? Of course I can do that, but ... I'm not sure that my
> >> Czechlish is understandable to anybody different then me, and you, as my
> >> colleagues ;)
> >>
> > 
> > right up there with root canals.  The man pages need love, and we will
> > get to them eventually.
> > 
> > Regards
> > -steve
> > 
> >> Regards,
> >>   Honza
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openais mailing list
> >> Openais@lists.linux-foundation.org
> >> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
Openais@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to