On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison
<ge...@geoffhutchison.net> wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>
>> I can probably take a pass at improving this, it will involve several
>> changes to the CMake code though. Is this a good time to do that?
>
> Yes. I'll be traveling the next week, so I don't anticipate a 2.3.1 release
> for at least a few weeks.
>
> If you have a chance, there's also the Mac/Python issue I mentioned (that
> _openbabel.so doesn't get linked against the installed libopenbabel.dylib but
> stays linked to ${CMAKE_BUILD_DIR}/libopenbabel.dylib). It's pretty easy to
> reproduce, since "make install; otool -L
> /Library/Python/2.6/site-packages/_openbabel.so" shows the wrong library path.
>
Is SWIG 2.0.2 known broken? That is what I have installed here and it
fails to compile even the Python bindings. I should be able to get
2.0.1 or something on the Mac and take a look at it there. I see in
the code you are only accepting 2.0.0 and 2.0.1, but I am also using
GCC 4.5 which can cause some issues occasionally too.
Marcus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-Devel mailing list
OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
