On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Chris Morley <c.mor...@gaseq.co.uk> wrote: > On 10/11/2011 15:35, David Lonie wrote: > The confusion caused by too much choice and the deficiencies in all of > the above mean that MolCore API (the proposed re-writing of the central > part of the toolkit) deserves better. I am pushing for no atom indexes > at all, and only one way for a user to reference an atom - a sort of > atom pointer which remains valid whatever you do to the molecule. It is > also an iterator that can be can be incremented in various interesting > ways.
Interesting -- I imagine there would still be an id, just no index? I rather like the sound of that, if it proves practical. It would certainly simplify things! Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
