Looks like you create a local OBMol which is then destroyed on return. You should probably use: OBMolecule *tmpMolecule =new OBMolecule(originalMo);
Hope this helps, Jean Le mercredi 06 février 2013 à 22:14 -0800, andi a écrit : > Hi all, > I am running into a strange problem and just can't seem to find a cause. > What I am trying to do is pass a an OBMol to some function and set some > generic data. One of the criteria is that I preserve the original molecule. > So what I do is I create a temporary mol and initialize it with the original > one such as this *OBMolecule tmpMolecule (originalMo);*. > > The problem I am running into is that after I set my generic data in some > other function, upon return, the generic data is not being reflected, but if > I pass the original molecule, then the data is reflected. > > Any help, suggestions would greatly be appreciated...I don't understand this > behavior at all. > > Thanks, > Andi > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forums.openbabel.org/Data-not-reflected-on-copied-molecule-tp4655926.html > Sent from the openbabel-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer > Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 > and get the hardware for free! Learn more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb > _______________________________________________ > OpenBabel-Devel mailing list > OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
