Appreciated! I was a bit shocked at how much code I had to change just to get the basics to run. I'd sort of forgotten that OpenBD was more CFMX7-compatible than CF8-compatible in terms of core language syntax. It looks like most of these syntax tweaks are planned for the 1.4 release - is there an ETA on that?
Sean On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Matthew Woodward<[email protected]> wrote: > Sean Corfield wrote: >> >> I'd like to be able to support OpenBD but I can't figure out what's >> wrong, after making all the syntax changes needed to get the basic >> code to "run"... >> > > I'm actually working on this now. Thus far I have it narrowed down to this: > when doController() is called, arguments.cfc is not a structure, it's an > empty string, so the <cfif structKeyExists(arguments.cfc ...> bit in that > function blows up. > > This is called from onRequest, specifically > doController(request.controller), but when I dump the request scope in the > onRequest method, request.controller is an empty string. I'd give you line > numbers but I'm modifying the CFC heavily as I go so the line numbers would > be rather irrelevant. > > Still digging further to see why the controller isn't getting set but maybe > that much will conjure up some thoughts. I'll let you know what I find as I > dig further. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
