On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:56 PM, G Allen R Souliere < [email protected]> wrote:
> True, the actual sort order would result in the same ordering if queried. > I was imagining he wanted to have an ordering that went from 1 to the total > number of photos. > > If it is only for display purposes, then its not technically necessary to > renumber the sort order in this way, because when looping over the query to > render it, you can use #CurrentRow#...which will always display from 1 to > the number of photos. > > (This is assuming you don't actually have to drive other processes off that > sort order value.) > > Yep, good points--hopefully that's what he was after! Thanks. -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca/Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !! To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openbd+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
