Sure that it reduced more common jars at GAE runtime. Other point of view, GAE Version = openbd cfml engine + compiler = 8M?
I have not try GAE version yet. On GAE enviroment should no need runtime compiler, will it only deploy compiled class to GAE? Any idea? thx. On Apr 9, 2:14 am, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gordon Luk <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just wonder why the gae version is slim? GAE 5MB vs Standard WAR > > 21MB. > > Compare WEB-INF/lib between the two for starters--OpenBD has a lot more JAR > files for the additional functionality it has vs. GAE. When you expand the > WAR for OpenBD it's got about 24MB of JAR files, as opposed to only 8MB of > JARs in the GAE edition. > > I haven't looked into things at this level of detail so I can't say for > sure, but I suspect this is because since you're deploying GAE toGoogle's > Java runtime they already have stuff there and available that has to be > included with OpenBD. > -- > Matthew Woodward > [email protected]http://blog.mattwoodward.com > identi.ca/Twitter: @mpwoodward > > Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, > etc. as attachments.http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !! To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
